Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Stephen Birch <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes
Date: 2000-01-04 19:52:25
Message-ID: 200001041952.OAA21002@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Could you outline the proposed changes? I am currently using datetime
> > and want to make sure my code doesn't break.
> > > > Thomas, are you planning on unifying the date/time types for 7.0?
>
> The datetime type will become "timestamp" and the timespan type will
> become "interval". Both "datetime" and "timespan" will become aliases
> for timestamp and interval, respectively, and code *should* work
> without having to be changed.

Wouldn't it make more sense to rename timestamp to datetime because
datetime is the ANSI name? Just asking.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-04 19:53:40 Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-04 19:50:04 Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource