Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote
Date: 2000-01-03 23:59:02
Message-ID: 200001032359.SAA05813@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > > > Was "spaces instead of tabs" one of the voted-on options? That would
> > > > make the tab issue moot, and would result in consistant appearance not
> > > > matter what tab setting one is using.
> > >
> > > I'd be willing to vote for this if the space penalty is not large...
> >
> > Me too!
>
> Count me in.

Do I need to tabluate a vote on this too?

I have to get all new votes from everyone on:

8-space tabs
no tabs

Indentaion is still 4-spaces.

I prefer the 8-space tabs to no tabs. Seems like 8-space tabs won over
4-space tabs, so we need a vote on 8-space tabs vs. no tabs.

I will need new votes because I have not kept any of the old messages.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-01-04 00:15:18 Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2000-01-03 23:18:54 Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote