| From: | Marten Feldtmann <marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2000-01-02 20:24:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200001022024.VAA09396@feki.toppoint.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > My big question is, what new challenges will we face as we become more
> > popular?
>
> The 3 greatest technical/engineering challenges:
1) system reliability
> & recoverability,
2) system reliability & recoverability, and
3) system reliability
> and recoverability.
Well said ! Some other points I would like to see:
- do not go the way to add features and features and all these
features perhaps only fullfill 90% of the specifications.
- stable sql-standard execution and with all features sql offers
- remember all the groub by - having ...
- remove internal limits
- vacuumdb and the three points above ...
After working now three months with psql the situation has improved,
but I'm still not sure if I can put this database to our customers.
Marten
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Mendonca | 2000-01-02 22:04:14 | Postgres functions |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-01-02 02:06:38 | Re: [GENERAL] Czech Win1250 sorting q |