Re: Proposal for XML Schema Validation

From: "Kodamasimham Pridhvi (MT2012066)" <Pridhvi(dot)Kodamasimham(at)iiitb(dot)org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bisen Vikrantsingh Mohansingh MT2012036" <BisenVikrantsingh(dot)Mohansingh(at)iiitb(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for XML Schema Validation
Date: 2013-09-05 13:31:37
Message-ID: 1f7db2f297334d37a1076090ea7777c3@SINPR01MB057.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-08-09 14:14:34, Craig Ringer wrote:
>Well, if you're planning on relying on libxml in core (and it'll have to
>be in core if you're adding new syntax) then you'll need a solid, well
>researched answer to that one or an alternative XML library that's
>portable and doesn't have those issues.

After doing some research regarding this issue and going through mailing list, we were unable to find a fix for memory management issue with libxml when used with postgresql can you please suggest us any alternative to libxml or redirect to some resources.

Thanks and Regrads,
Pridhvi and Vikranthsingh,
IIITB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2013-09-05 13:35:52 Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Previous Message ktm@rice.edu 2013-09-05 13:25:14 Re: get rid of SQL_ASCII?