Re: Help: Installing 9.6 breaks local connections to 9.2 on Centos 6.9

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Help: Installing 9.6 breaks local connections to 9.2 on Centos 6.9
Date: 2017-05-15 23:45:46
Message-ID: 1f78a2c6-8b80-461f-0928-81d8650f8920@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 05/15/2017 01:40 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:

>
> But let me ask, is there a big warning about this somewhere I missed?
> Can the 9.2 updates do something to fix this, or at least create a
> warning or an RPMNEW file? I'm happy this is a cloud server and that I
> worked on a copy. However, in different circumstances I might well have
> reasoned "well, installing the 9.6 packages really should be safe for
> 9.2, since they're clearly meant to exist side-by-side." And then have
> a setup that no longer worked as it once did. With an RHEL clone and
> PGDG packages straight from the horses mouth, I'd have higher
> expectations than that. Only because of the great work y'all do! ;)

Might want to file an issue here:

https://redmine.postgresql.org/projects/pgrpms/

You will need a Postgres community account, which you can sign up for on
the same page.

>
> Cheers,
> Ken
>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guyren Howe 2017-05-16 04:24:39 Text value within composite function result not quoted
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-15 23:37:23 Re: Add NAMEDATALEN to PG_CONFIG?