Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <champion(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Date: 2024-01-22 23:01:20
Message-ID: 1f5becbf-33a6-ad92-51ad-c24f1d858b17@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2024-01-22 Mo 14:16, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2024-01-22 Mo 01:29, Peter Smith wrote:
>> 2024-01 Commitfest.
>>
>> Hi, This patch has a CF status of "Needs Review" [1], but it seems
>> there were CFbot test failures last time it was run [2]. Please have a
>> look and post an updated version if necessary.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Let's see if the attached does better.

This time for sure! (Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!)

It turns out that NO_TEMP_INSTALL=1 can do ugly things, so I removed it,
and I think the test will now pass.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Introduce-a-non-recursive-JSON-parser.patch text/x-patch 421.1 KB
v5-0002-Add-support-for-incrementally-parsing-backup-mani.patch text/x-patch 7.6 KB
v5-0003-Use-incremental-parsing-of-backup-manifests.patch text/x-patch 11.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2024-01-22 23:33:54 Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-01-22 22:59:59 Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column