On 02.09.24 01:55, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:28 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 10:35:27PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>>> This path hasn't changes since the patch revision when it was a
>>> utility command. I agree that this doesn't look like proper path for
>>> stored procedure. But I don't think src/backend/utils/adt is
>>> appropriate path either, because it's not really about data type.
>>> pg_wal_replay_wait() looks a good neighbor for
>>> pg_wal_replay_pause()/pg_wal_replay_resume() and other WAL-related
>>> functions. So, what about moving it to src/backend/access/transam?
>>
>> Moving the new function to xlogfuncs.c while publishing
>> WaitForLSNReplay() makes sense to me.
>
> Thank you for proposal. I like this.
>
> Could you, please, check the attached patch?
We still have stuff in src/backend/commands/waitlsn.c that is nothing
like a "command". You have moved some stuff elsewhere, but what are you
planning to do with the rest?