| From: | imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Data type OID numbers fixed? |
| Date: | 2008-07-08 00:38:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1f30b80c0807071738y3cc2762bw8db082e2c84b6705@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'd include catalog/pg_type.h and use the #DEFINE for that.
--Imad
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>
>> How large is the probability of these numbers ever changing?
>
> Really small. I'd just hardcode them.
>
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-08 00:39:47 | Re: 8.1 index corruption woes |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-07-08 00:34:39 | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 |