Re: Add privileges test for pg_stat_statements to improve coverage

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: kuroda(dot)keisuke(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add privileges test for pg_stat_statements to improve coverage
Date: 2024-07-23 18:27:15
Message-ID: 1f117e31-1667-4c1b-892a-849779c6cb94@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024/07/23 15:02, kuroda(dot)keisuke(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp wrote:
> Hi Fujii-san,
> Thank you for your comment!
>
> attach v5 fixed patch.
>
>> Using "postgres" as the default superuser name can cause instability.
>> This is why the Patch Tester reports now test failures again.
>> You should create and use a different superuser, such as
>> "regress_stats_superuser."
>
> I understand.
> Add "regress_stats_superuser" for test by superuser.

Thanks for updating the patch!

I've slightly modified the comments in the regression tests for clarity.
Attached is the v6 patch. If there are no objections,
I will push this version.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-pg_stat_statements-Add-regression-test-for-privil.patch text/plain 9.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcos Pegoraro 2024-07-23 18:35:13 Useless toast
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-07-23 17:32:29 Re: Direct SSL connection and ALPN loose ends