From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests |
Date: | 2017-06-26 14:05:03 |
Message-ID: | 1ec8438d-116c-00fa-ca04-4ffbd7efbae1@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/23/2017 07:47 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 06/23/2017 12:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> On 06/22/2017 10:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> That earlier request is still valid. Also, if you can reproduce the
>>>> symptom that lorikeet just showed and get a stack trace from the
>>>> (hypothetical) postmaster core dump, that would be hugely valuable.
>>> See attached log and stacktrace
>> The stacktrace seems to be from the parallel-query-leader backend.
>> Was there another core file?
>>
>> The lack of any indication in the postmaster log that the postmaster saw
>> the parallel worker's crash sure looks the same as lorikeet's failure.
>> But if the postmaster didn't dump core, then we're still at a loss as to
>> why it didn't respond.
>>
>>
>
>
> Rerunning with some different settings to see if I can get separate cores.
>
Numerous attempts to get core dumps following methods suggested in
Google searches have failed. The latest one is just hanging.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2017-06-26 14:15:39 | Re: Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend |
Previous Message | Joel Jacobson | 2017-06-26 14:00:55 | \set AUTOROLLBACK ON |