From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Logical Replication WIP |
Date: | 2016-09-09 20:34:08 |
Message-ID: | 1ea1ccf5-b5a8-5e47-8e12-6fdd316f417b@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/6/16 8:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Some thoughts on pg_dump and such:
Another issue to add to this list:
With the current patch set, pg_dump will fail for unprivileged users,
because it can't read pg_subscription. The include_subscription flag
ought to be checked in getSubscriptions() already, not (only) in
dumpSubscription(). The test suite for pg_dump fails because of this.
We might make further changes in this area, per ongoing discussion, but
it would be good to put in a quick fix for this in the next patch set so
that the global test suite doesn't fail.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-09-09 20:54:06 | Re: More ideas for speeding up sorting |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-09-09 19:40:27 | Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE |