Re: Death postgres

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Death postgres
Date: 2023-05-06 14:19:24
Message-ID: 1e765391-d753-4a49-6dd2-7f99a5a55683@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/6/23 08:52, Marc Millas wrote:
>
> Le sam. 6 mai 2023 à 15:15, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
>
>
[snip]
>
> If your question is about temp_file_limit, don't distract us with OOM
> issues.
>
> My question is how postgres can use space without caring about
> temp_file_limit. The oom info is kind of hint about the context as, as
> said, one select did generate both things

It's a distraction to lead with "OOM killed my process".  Evidence of this
fact is that all respondents have talked about is memory, not disk space.

--
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Guyot 2023-05-06 14:48:18 Re: Death postgres
Previous Message Marc Millas 2023-05-06 13:52:47 Re: Death postgres