From: | Martin Marques <martin(dot)marques(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Deadlock between concurrent index builds on different tables |
Date: | 2017-12-23 11:22:33 |
Message-ID: | 1df2ab90-664f-1d91-8c58-a465a971d32e@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
El 23/12/17 a las 08:08, Alban Hertroys escribió:
>
>> On 22 Dec 2017, at 22:53, Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> 2017-12-22 15:48:07.669 CST,"CREATE INDEX",2017-12-22 15:48:02 CST,8/32,0,ERROR,40P01,"deadlock detected","Process 4470 waits for ShareLock on virtual transaction 4/262; blocked by process 4466.
>> Process 4466 waits for ShareLock on virtual transaction 8/32; blocked by process 4470.
>> Process 4470: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY index_foo_on_created_at ON foo USING btree (created_at);
>> Process 4466: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY index_bar_on_id ON bar USING btree (id);","See server log for query details.",,,,"CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY index_foo_on_created_at ON foo USING btree (created_at);",,,""
>
> If I read these logs correctly, you are creating the exact same index on foo (created_at) in both processes, which is just what you were trying to prevent doing.
They are two distinct indexes. One on foo(create_at) and the other on
bar(id)
--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Marques | 2017-12-23 11:40:18 | Re: Deadlock between concurrent index builds on different tables |
Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2017-12-23 11:08:42 | Re: Deadlock between concurrent index builds on different tables |