Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?

From: "Willy-Bas Loos" <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?
Date: 2007-01-29 12:46:23
Message-ID: 1dd6057e0701290446p404862ccr9ec6b27b05d482b9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On second thought, you might be referring to pg_hba.conf?
That would not be applicable for a web-service, since all users would
connect through the same IP-adress..

On 1/29/07, Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >I think that the
> >main bottleneck would be the "flat file" that's used to tell the
> >postmaster about the set of valid users --- every time a user is
> >added/dropped/changed, that file gets rewritten and then re-parsed
> >by the postmaster. So you could eat a lot of overhead if you change
> >users every few seconds or something like that.
>
> I'm developing the same kind of application right now. We've been
> successful in programming per-user row-level security, we're quite happy
> with it. Even if someone should crack our web-server he still could not do
> anything much with the database, which holds what really matters to us.
> I've heard about the performance drawbacks, but never the exact reason for
> it.
> What you describe Tom (flat file), sounds a bit strange to me. Aren't
> users stored in a table? (pg_catalog.pg_authid)
> I guess maybe those (system) tables are stored differently than normal
> ones?
>
> Willy-Bas
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2007-01-29 13:29:56 Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Previous Message Matthias.Pitzl 2007-01-29 12:34:47 Re: Postgresql 8.1: plperl code works with LATIN1, fail