Re: Wal receiver process listens to physical IP

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Mariya Rampurawala <Mariya(dot)Rampurawala(at)veritas(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wal receiver process listens to physical IP
Date: 2020-03-20 13:32:03
Message-ID: 1dd417aa285601172a5750354479d209500037aa.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 11:27 +0000, Mariya Rampurawala wrote:
> I have been working on a project where I need to virtualize the postgresql standby server.
> The wal receiver process listens to the Physical IP and a random port.
> How can I configure it to listen to a VIP that the wal sender process can connect to?
> Also, Is there a way I can configure the port number for this?
>
> $ /usr/pgsql-12/bin/postgres -V
> postgres (PostgreSQL) 12.2
>
> postgresql.conf:
> listen_addresses = '10.209.57.17'  This is the VIP
>
> $ ps -ef | grep post
> postgres 2945 1 0 05:37 ? 00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-12/bin/postgres -D /pg_mnt/pg-12/data -h 10.209.57.17
> postgres 2946 2945 0 05:37 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger
> postgres 2947 2945 0 05:37 ? 00:00:00 postgres: startup recovering 000000010000000000000007
> postgres 2952 2945 0 05:37 ? 00:00:00 postgres: checkpointer
> postgres 2953 2945 0 05:37 ? 00:00:00 postgres: background writer
> postgres 2954 2945 0 05:37 ? 00:00:00 postgres: stats collector
> postgres 2955 2945 0 05:37 ? 00:00:04 postgres: walreceiver
>
> $ netstat -anp | grep 55656
> tcp 0 0 10.209.57.15:55656 10.209.57.16:5432 ESTABLISHED 2955/postgres: walr
>
> 10.209.57.15 is the physical IP
>
> $ ps -ef | grep 2955
> postgres 2955 2945 0 05:37 ? 00:00:04 postgres: walreceiver

The standby is *listening* on 10.209.57.17 for connections, but
the WAL receiver is not listening, it actively connects to the primary
server. Obviously it is using the other network interface.

To change that, you would have to change the network route to the primary
server to lead through the virtual interface.
But I don't see any reason to do that.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2020-03-20 13:35:01 Re: Partition by hash formula
Previous Message rob stone 2020-03-20 12:39:01 Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)