Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Richard Welty" <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>, "PgSQL Performance ML" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-13 01:48:18
Message-ID: 1da301c3613c$f8716960$2800a8c0@mars
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> there are advantages to being able to split the database across a slew of
> disk drives. if we accept the notion of using the native OS filesystem on
> each, it would seem that being able to direct various tables and indices
to
> specific drives might be a valuble capability. i know that i could go into
> /var/lib/pgsql/data/base and fan the contents out, but this is unweildy
and
> impractical. has any consideration been given to providing a way to manage
> such a deployment?

We've got a little bunch of us tinkering with a tablespace implementation.
However, it's been staller for a while now.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Welty 2003-08-13 01:52:52 Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2003-08-12 21:43:29 Re: Perfomance Tuning