Re: benchmarking the query planner

From: "Vladimir Sitnikov" <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: benchmarking the query planner
Date: 2008-12-11 22:47:08
Message-ID: 1d709ecc0812111447m7b48bf4eg1b74e454ee3e7b7b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> What is the specific difference between what you are talking about and
> what scalarineqsel already implements?
>
Hmm... Northing new. Feel sorry for bothering you. I did not realize
histograms are implemented.

Regards,
Vladimir Sitnikov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-12-11 22:48:37 Re: benchmarking the query planner
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-12-11 22:45:47 Re: benchmarking the query planner