| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli(dot)khodorkovskiy(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc |
| Date: | 2020-03-21 17:40:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1d5baa7f-e8e4-b640-a7a1-56217d2a6ce9@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-03-19 14:29, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>> More specifically, I don't agree with the wholesale renaming of
>> auxiliary process to subprocess. Besides the massive code churn, the
>
> I'm not sure I understand the argument here. Where do you see
> wholesale renaming of AuxProc to Subprocess? Subprocess is the name
> for postmaster subprocesses, whereas Auxiliary Processes are a subset
> of those processes.
Specifically renaming AuxProcType to SubprocessType and everything that
follows from that, including the name of new files.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-03-21 18:14:44 | Re: Ecpg dependency |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-03-21 15:15:13 | Re: Add A Glossary |