From: | Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris <pglist(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SCHEMA compatibility with Oracle/DB2/Firebird |
Date: | 2005-01-23 03:25:26 |
Message-ID: | 1d581afe05012219253ddd2c38@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:25:39 -0800, Chris <pglist(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I know this isn't entirely postgresql specific, but it wouldn't be on
> another list either so here goes...
>
> I am writing an open source application where I would like to support
> at least oracle, and possibly firebird or DB2, in addition to
> postgresql which will be the default. I'm not going to try to support
> mysql.
FWIW, Firebird doesn't have any form of schemas or cross-database
query support (although I think commercial third-party extensions might exist
for the latter).
You'll probably be best off explicitly providing schema names for your common
functions, e.g. SELECT * FROM common.mytable . Depending on your app,
that could be better from a security point of view in PostgreSQL as well,
if you want to prevent your users from sneakily replacing the common
database objects.
Ian Barwick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Audette | 2005-01-23 03:47:09 | Re: Windows 2000 Slower Than Windows XP |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2005-01-23 03:09:33 | Re: pg SQL question |