Re: New trigger option of pg_standby

From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date: 2009-03-25 08:55:49
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10903250155w34bd79dcvfab2ad5c95e56011@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, I agree... but there may be scripts for warm-standby based on
> the existing default behavior. So, I didn't make a new trigger the default.

I don't use pg_standby personnaly but I admit I'm quite surprised by
the current behaviour. I'm pretty sure a lot of the current users
would be surprised too.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuhito Kasahara 2009-03-25 09:08:43 display previous query string of idle-in-transaction
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2009-03-25 08:44:52 Re: New trigger option of pg_standby