| From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tatsuo Ishii" <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CVS Head psql bug? |
| Date: | 2008-07-28 22:12:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10807281512w3ab0a3f1i14709a4e848facaf@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Okay, it seems fairly close to RHEL-4. Doesn't
> look like there are any RHEL4 or CentOS4 machines in the buildfarm,
> which is why we didn't find out about it earlier.
FYI, I set up a CentOS 4 vserver on one of our buildfarm boxes. It's
called guanaco:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=guanaco&br=HEAD
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2008-07-28 22:16:25 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2008-07-28 21:39:13 | Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 |