Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Date: 2008-05-29 14:41:56
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10805290741qc52725fibea2858be2f632cd@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus,
> do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?

IIRC, noone voted against backpatching it after Alvaro and you agreed
with doing so.

Archives link: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-05/msg00243.php

It would be nice to have it fixed in 8.3.2, even if it's not really
blocking for the release.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2008-05-29 14:54:03 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-29 14:41:51 Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-05-29 14:46:18 Re: pg_lzcompress patch for 8.3, 8.2 branch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-29 14:41:51 Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases