From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases |
Date: | 2008-05-29 14:41:56 |
Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10805290741qc52725fibea2858be2f632cd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus,
> do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?
IIRC, noone voted against backpatching it after Alvaro and you agreed
with doing so.
Archives link: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-05/msg00243.php
It would be nice to have it fixed in 8.3.2, even if it's not really
blocking for the release.
--
Guillaume
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2008-05-29 14:54:03 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-29 14:41:51 | Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-05-29 14:46:18 | Re: pg_lzcompress patch for 8.3, 8.2 branch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-29 14:41:51 | Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases |