From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
Date: | 2008-02-06 20:41:09 |
Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10802061241v580ab9cctd99a8daccdb86835@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 6, 2008 9:56 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Whenever a commit fest is in progress, the
> focus will shift from development to review, feedback and commit of
> patches. Each fest will continue until all patches in the queue have
> either been committed to the CVS repository, returned to the author
> for additional work, or rejected outright, and until that has
> happened, no new patches will be considered.
If we don't have a bench farm anytime soon, I think we should consider
planning a set of benchmarks after each commit fest to prevent
performance regressions on different workloads. I don't expect them to
be comprehensive but it could allow us to prevent the most obvious
regressions.
--
Guillaume
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-02-06 20:46:22 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-02-06 20:35:54 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |