Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Markus Bertheau" <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers list" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Date: 2008-01-27 20:11:45
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10801271211y1ef26abdr3649d65a53bc22c9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 27, 2008 9:07 PM, Markus Bertheau <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2008/1/28, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> >
> > Do we have nominations for a name? The first idea that comes to mind
> > is "synchronized_scanning" (defaulting to ON).
>
> "synchronized_sequential_scans" is a bit long, but contains the
> keyword "sequential scans", which will ring a bell with many, more so
> than "synchronized_scanning".

synchronize_seqscans?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-01-27 20:27:24 Re: what is suffix _P in gram.y
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2008-01-27 20:10:31 what is suffix _P in gram.y