Re: big database performance

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Adrian Moisey" <adrian(at)careerjunction(dot)co(dot)za>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: big database performance
Date: 2008-01-09 16:59:58
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10801090859l55b35082r5992a1bb81f1ec32@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Joshua,

On Jan 9, 2008 9:27 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> wal_sync_method = open_sync

Do you recommend it in every situation or just because data are on a
SAN? Do you have any numbers/real cases explaining this choice.

Thanks.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jared Mauch 2008-01-09 17:42:43 Re: big database performance
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-01-09 16:50:58 Re: big database performance