From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
Date: | 2007-10-01 13:58:44 |
Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10710010658y1ce9f75cn6a6fe4de71118d30@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/22/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Please try that experiment with all three configurations on both
> versions:
> * autovacuum off
> * autovacuum on, autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 0
> * autovacuum on, autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20
I've finally found some time to spend on these tests. Here are the results:
* 8.2.5 *
- autovacuum off + ANALYZE: less than 16 minutes (figures previously
posted in this thread) - default configuration of 8.2
- autovacuum on, delay 0: 16m29
- autovacuum on, delay 20: 16m13
(I didn't repeat the run but we can see that autovacuum doesn't
introduce too much slowdown during the restore operation)
* 8.3devel freshly compiled *
- autovacuum off: 14m39
- autovacuum on, delay 0: 15m32
- autovacuum on, delay 20: 51m37 (the box is idle during a large
amount of this time) - default configuration of 8.3devel
--
Guillaume
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Maier | 2007-10-01 15:27:57 | Re: IDE |
Previous Message | Pedro Belmino | 2007-10-01 13:42:23 | IDE |