From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes |
Date: | 2007-05-11 11:29:09 |
Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10705110429n3e7f1f9as8eab7fcbeb610758@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 5/11/07, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree that debug levels are not suitable for this.
Squid (the (reverse) proxy) has a nice feature for debugging purposes
(admin and developers). It's possible to have different logging level
for different sections of the code. For example, if you want to debug
a particular part, you can have ALL,1 33,2 in your config file which
allows you to have a more verbose debug on the section 33 of the code
(33 is ACL).
It's really useful because you can even debug a particular code path
or a misconfiguration in production without generating a huge amount
of logs.
--
Guillaume
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-11 11:41:36 | Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-05-11 10:47:24 | Re: Seq scans roadmap |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-11 11:41:36 | Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-11 10:01:38 | Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes |