Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP
Date: 2006-03-16 13:41:50
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10603160541w59e19034scd13a4e11a9b9c09@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 3/16/06, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
> Very strange.

Sure. I can't find any logical explanation for that but it is the
behaviour we have for more than a year now (the site was migrated from
Oracle to PostgreSQL on january 2005).
We check iostat, vmstat and so on without any hint on why we have this
behaviour.

> The client has just bought an Opteron to run on, I'm afraid. I might try
> 8.1 on the Xeon but it'll just be to see what happens and that won't be
> for a while.

I don't think it will be an option for us so I will have more
information next week.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2006-03-16 14:17:32 Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP
Previous Message Sven Geisler 2006-03-16 13:11:16 Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP