| From: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL downloads compressed with bzip2 instead of |
| Date: | 2003-03-20 15:39:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1d150e981ebab6162f5cd86a1e87034f@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Moral of the Story:
>
> A smaller file to download (via better compression) only decreases the
> time it takes to download.
I think the real argument in favor of providing a bz2 alternative to gz
*is* the time to download. Loading a Postgres tarball over a dialup line
is much faster with bz2 rather than gz. This has been covered on the list
before: I recall that most everyone agreed it was a good idea, but nobody
on the website appeared ready to follow through with it and actually
set up the bz2 files.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200303201036
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE+eeCfvJuQZxSWSsgRAvy+AJ9wWoOgXezn3p01/D4jed2sNqT6DQCfXkz5
0uvv7khQJ4LAXMYydMnpWdM=
=Lg8Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 15:43:38 | Re: Big insert/delete memory problems |
| Previous Message | Ennio Iannucci | 2003-03-20 15:39:16 | [NOVICE] Extended display and extended ascii characters |