From: | Elena Indrupskaya <e(dot)indrupskaya(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Inaccurate usage of "which" instead of "that" in parallel.sgml |
Date: | 2021-09-01 10:24:18 |
Message-ID: | 1c994b3d-951e-59bb-1ac2-7b9221c0e4cf@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hi everybody,
I noticed that in parallel.sgml, "which" is often used in defining
clauses, where "that" is appropriate
(as explained at
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/which-vs-that/?&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=11907689446&utm_targetid=aud-1117013793091:dsa-1233402314764&gclid=CjwKCAjwybyJBhBwEiwAvz4G77NN1eaRDOA4eGNa38UsoWXJwRG43pegXBNOiamA3Y0A3FHhZzFJJRoCXEMQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds).
So I attached a patch to fix this and also to add a preceding comma
before "which" in one non-defining clause.
Since the content of parallel.sgml is not new, the documentation for
earlier versions of PostgreSQL has the same inaccuracies, and it would
be great to fix them there too. The patch also applies to versions 12
and 13, except one @@ section).
Thank you.
--
Elena Indrupskaya
Lead Technical Writer
Postgres Professional http://www.postgrespro.com
<http://www.postgrespro.com>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
WhichVsThat14.patch | text/x-patch | 12.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-09-01 12:27:40 | Re: Simple re-wording |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2021-09-01 07:57:51 | Simple re-wording |