From: | adey <adey11(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Chris Hoover" <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: best way to choose index to cluster on? |
Date: | 2006-09-25 22:27:03 |
Message-ID: | 1c66bda80609251527i4e8bad89jb6c1420cd44a8a33@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
A good guide for a clustered index is:-
Will the index be unique, static and narrow.
If not, avoid clustered indexing as they require extra work on disk to
maintain their sequence.
On 9/26/06, Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I am looking to squeeze a bit more speed out of my database by clustering
> most of my tables. However, on tables with multiple indexes, how is the
> best way to choose the index. I am thinking I want to use the index with
> the largest pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_tup_read. Would this be correct? If
> not, what column(s) and views should I be looking at to find the most
> popular index?
>
> Secondly, I have some partial indexes on a very active table, and it tends
> to have the highest idx_tup_read for that table. Is is possible to cluster
> on a partial index?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-09-25 22:31:44 | Re: best way to choose index to cluster on? |
Previous Message | August Zajonc | 2006-09-25 21:57:04 | Re: The server lacks instrumentation functions |