From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
Date: | 2020-04-30 01:22:36 |
Message-ID: | 1c5ca197-f7f2-0300-46ce-4652c7f81d48@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/29/20 8:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> On 4/29/20 7:40 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> I'll compromise on the temporary importants, but first I want to see
>>> what's causing the need for it. Do you have a suggestion on a page to test?
>
> I haven't yet pushed anything dependent on the new markup, but
> attached is a draft revision for the JSON section; if you look at
> the SRFs such as json_array_elements you'll see the issue.
>
>> From real quick I got it to here. With the latest copy of the doc builds
>> it appears to still work as expected, but I need a section with the new
>> "pre" block to test.
>
> Yeah, I see you found the same <p> and <pre> settings I did.
>
>> I think the "background-color: inherit !important" is a bit odd, and
>> would like to trace that one down a bit more, but I did not see anything
>> obvious on my glance through it.
>
> I think it's coming from this bit at about main.css:660:
>
> pre,
> code,
> #docContent kbd,
> #docContent tt.LITERAL,
> #docContent tt.REPLACEABLE {
> font-size: 0.9rem !important;
> color: inherit !important;
> background-color: #f8f9fa !important;
> border-radius: .25rem;
> margin: .6rem 0;
> font-weight: 300;
> }
>
> I had to override most of that.
Yeah, I had started toying with that and saw no differences, but I would
need to test against anything in particular. I'm pretty confident we can
remove those importants, based on my desultory testing.
I'll try and get the patch built + docs loaded, and see if we can safely
remove those.
Jonathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-04-30 01:25:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-30 00:35:39 | Re: Raw device on PostgreSQL |