From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | pg_dumpall --exclude-database case folding |
Date: | 2021-06-14 13:46:06 |
Message-ID: | 1c3afeff-02f5-bf6c-9f6e-03aff2755e4f@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
[discussion transferred from psql-performance]
Summary: pg_dumpall and pg_dump fold non-quoted commandline patterns to
lower case
Tom lane writes:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 6/10/21 2:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Ouch. That looks like a plain old bug. Let's fix it. IIRC I just used
>> the same logic that we use for pg_dump's --exclude-* options, so we need
>> to check if they have similar issues.
> Peter Eisentraut has pointed out to me that this is documented, albeit a
> bit obscurely for pg_dumpall. But it is visible on the pg_dump page.
Hmm.
> Nevertheless, it's a bit of a POLA violation as we've seen above, and
> I'd like to get it fixed, if there's agreement, both for this pg_dumpall
> option and for pg_dump's pattern matching options.
+1, but the -performance list isn't really where to hold that discussion.
Please start a thread on -hackers.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-06-14 14:04:59 | Re: A new function to wait for the backend exit after termination |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-14 13:39:12 | Re: recent failures on lorikeet |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-06-14 14:14:23 | Re: overcommit_ratio setting |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-14 13:32:21 | Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database case folding, was Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster |