| From: | Anders Moe <anders(dot)moe(at)geocap(dot)no> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Not possible to create 64 bit windows clients ? |
| Date: | 2009-11-09 12:47:55 |
| Message-ID: | 1bfd8f720911090447y78272881k11a1e60eb32abb08@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
It's true that PostGIS is server side, so that's not really an issue. As far
as ODBC is concerned I'm just working from the assumption that a native link
is generally preferable. If anyone tells me that the psql ODBC link has the
same features/performance that's fine with me.....? :)
Anders
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:47:48AM +0100, Anders Moe wrote:
> > We're trying to get our 64 bt windows application to use postgresql,
> which
> > means I have to #include stuff from psql and link to 64 bit versions of
> the
> > libs. Which do not seem to exist.
> >
> > Spesifically I need to get Qt compiled with psql (and eventually
> postGIS).
>
> Why does Postgres need to be 64bit, couldn't you go through the windows
> ODBC layer if you want 64 bit client support? Also, isn't PostGIS just
> server side and hence you shouldn't have to worry about it client side?
>
> --
> Sam http://samason.me.uk/
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
________________________________________________________
Anders Moe
Technical Manager
Geocap
w: +47 22 95 56 66
anders(dot)moe(at)geocap(dot)no
________________________________________________________
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Johan Nel | 2009-11-09 13:21:12 | Re: alter table is taking a long time |
| Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2009-11-09 12:32:46 | Re: Not possible to create 64 bit windows clients ? |