From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy |
Date: | 2017-02-23 21:20:44 |
Message-ID: | 1b63bdb1-12ed-0b95-061e-ead68d3e0e4b@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/4/17 1:47 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I'm tempted to put the old logic back, but more because this likely was
> unintentional, not because I think it's clearly better.
>
>
> +1
> Yes, it was unintentional change. So we should put old logic back
> unless we have proof that this change make it better.
> Patch is attached. I tried to make some comments, but probably they are
> not enough.
Added to CF: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/13/1029/
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nico Williams | 2017-02-23 21:27:43 | Re: Idea on how to simplify comparing two sets |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-02-23 21:16:07 | Re: Idea on how to simplify comparing two sets |