From: | Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |
Date: | 2021-10-18 06:44:51 |
Message-ID: | 1b1d4fcf-1b73-243e-9930-dd1c810a2405@migops.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le 17/10/2021 à 23:48, Isaac Morland a écrit :
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 17:42, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com
> <mailto:gilles(at)migops(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Perhaps I misunderstand what you are saying, but a no-columns table
> definitely can return rows:
>
> psql (12.2)
> Type "help" for help.
>
> postgres=# create table nada ();
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# insert into nada default values;
> INSERT 0 1
> postgres=# insert into nada default values;
> INSERT 0 1
> postgres=# table nada;
> --
> (2 rows)
>
> postgres=#
>
> Note that psql doesn't display a separate line for each row in this
> case, but the actual result coming back from the server does contain
> the appropriate number of rows.
I was not aware of that. In this case perhaps that we can remove the
restriction on having at least on expandable column and we will have the
same behavior but I can't think of an interest to allow that.
--
Gilles Darold
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-10-18 06:45:10 | Re: try_relation_open and relation_open behave different. |
Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-10-18 06:16:20 | RE: Added schema level support for publication. |