From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pabloa98 <pabloa98(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: how to add more than 1600 columns in a table? |
Date: | 2019-04-24 20:47:16 |
Message-ID: | 1a69e85f-446b-99fa-d161-a647a79c0b69@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 4/24/19 4:17 PM, pabloa98 wrote:
> Sadly today we hit the 1600 columns limit of Postgresql 11.
>
> How could we add more columns?
>
> Note: Tables are OK. We truly have 2400 columns now. Each column
> represents a value in a matrix.
As everyone else has mentioned, your use case sounds like arrays are
appropriate. Note that PostgreSQL supports 2 dimensional (actually more
than 2d if you wanted) arrays which are essentially perfect for
representing a matrix.
If this works for your data model it will likely save a ton of storage
space and perform much better than alternatives.
FWIW, if you are needing to do matrix math, you might want to look into
PL/R (https://github.com/postgres-plr/plr) as it supports 2d arrays as
arguments which are converted directly into R matrices.
I don't know for sure but likely PL/Python could be used to process
matrices as well.
HTH,
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2019-04-24 22:03:02 | Re: Forcing index usage |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2019-04-24 20:34:12 | Re: how to add more than 1600 columns in a table? |