Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql(at)mailpen(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Date: 2021-05-29 16:25:48
Message-ID: 1a2f01ce-b3da-3066-0642-3e311587ece3@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On 5/28/21 5:38 PM, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:

>>
>> Did it run in less than 10 hours?
>>
>
> The original VACUUM FULL ANALYZE ran in 10 hours.  The plain ANALYZE ran
> in 88 seconds.

Can you repeat your EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) of the query from your
first post and post them here:

https://explain.depesz.com/

Other information:
1) A diff of your configuration settings between 9.6 and 13.2.

2) Are you running on the same AWS instance type for the two versions of
Postgres?

It is not necessary to repeat the table/view definitions as they are
available in the first post.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laura Smith 2021-05-29 16:34:23 Re: Overriding natural order of query results for a subset
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2021-05-29 16:06:00 Re: Overriding natural order of query results for a subset

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2021-05-29 19:59:47 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2021-05-29 11:39:29 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster