Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> How is the Postgres port of the Wikipedia doing this days anyway?
> Is it in a shape where one would consider it "competitive"?

The port of MediaWiki is going well: it is certainly usable, and
is already being used by a number of sites. I would not say it is
quite "competitive" yet as far as being ready to run Wikipedia, as
the codebase has a lot of very mysql-specific stuff that has yet to
be fixed/coded around. There are also a few lingering bugs, most
related to the fact that the MediaWiki on Mysql stores dates as
char(14).

For the record, anyone using wikipgedia deserves the pain they
get: it is deprecated. The latest version of MediaWiki itself is what
should now be used: it will detect if you have Postgres upon
installation. :)

http://www.mediawiki.org/

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200702250925
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFF4ZyDvJuQZxSWSsgRA8c6AJ95oTX9YQ38VyPvFyhd54S3rHAZSACgh/tC
uqcAmRFuRnMUdPL7sO/eoP0=
=w2KL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----