Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions

From: Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464(at)aol(dot)com>
To: Robert Zenz <robert(dot)zenz(at)sibvisions(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions
Date: 2018-01-30 15:25:09
Message-ID: 1F70E659-7F3A-4F65-86B7-27D794F472D7@aol.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> I'm not sure about the terminology here, though, because the Transaction
> Tutorial (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/tutorial-transactions.html)
> speaks of "aborted" transactions, while you use the term "failed" here.

Purely from a user point of view, shouldn't "aborted" mean a ROLLBACK issues by the application
due to a violation of a business rule, whereas "failed" should mean as a ROLLBACK issues by
PG due to constraint violation or like disk full or whatever.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-01-30 15:29:40 Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2018-01-30 14:30:40 Re: session_replication_role meaning?