| From: | decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jignesh K(dot) Shah <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4 |
| Date: | 2009-03-14 15:06:08 |
| Message-ID: | 1E9C2E4B-4C0C-4343-B244-388DA2047870@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> Fair enough.. Well I am now appealing to all who has a fairly
> decent sized hardware want to try it out and see whether there are
> "gains", "no-changes" or "regressions" based on your workload. Also
> it will help if you report number of cpus when you respond back to
> help collect feedback.
Do you have a self-contained test case? I have several boxes with 16-
cores worth of Xeon with 96GB I could try it on (though you might not
care about having "only" 16 cores :P)
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | decibel | 2009-03-14 15:22:38 | Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4 |
| Previous Message | decibel | 2009-03-14 14:47:53 | Re: Query performance over a large proportion of data |