| From: | Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Dave Peticolas <dave(at)krondo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL replay issue from 9.6.8 to 9.6.10 |
| Date: | 2018-08-29 04:48:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1DDC88B1-20CD-4841-88F2-6F481C99970C@a-kretschmer.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 29 August 2018 06:26:06 CEST, Dave Peticolas <dave(at)krondo(dot)com> wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:21 PM Andreas Kretschmer
><andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
>wrote:
>
>> On 29 August 2018 06:02:45 CEST, Dave Peticolas <dave(at)krondo(dot)com>
>wrote:
>> >Hello, I'm seeing some issues with WAL replay on a test server
>running
>> >9.6.10 using WAL archived from a 9.6.8 primary server. It reliably
>> >
>>
>> Can you tell us the wal-level?
>>
>
>Yes, it is "hot_standby".
ok, this was to just rule out a problem that we discovered with logical decoding, but this isn't the case here.
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shaun Savage | 2018-08-29 05:09:03 | using a plpgsql function argument as a table column. |
| Previous Message | Dave Peticolas | 2018-08-29 04:26:06 | Re: WAL replay issue from 9.6.8 to 9.6.10 |