Re: Hardware suggestions for high performance 8.3

From: Henrik <henke(at)mac(dot)se>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware suggestions for high performance 8.3
Date: 2008-06-25 22:32:03
Message-ID: 1D62209E-DFEE-4994-8B5B-BC181608B0AE@mac.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


25 jun 2008 kl. 17.45 skrev Greg Smith:

> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Henrik wrote:
>
>> Would you turn off fsync if you had a controller with BBU? =)
>
> Turning off fsync has some potential to introduce problems even in
> that environment, so better not to do that. The issue is that you
> might have, say, 1GB of OS-level cache but 256MB of BBU cache, and
> if you turn fsync off it won't force the OS cache out to the
> controller when it's supposed to and that can cause corruption.
>
> Also, if you've got a controller with BBU, the overhead of fsync for
> regular writes is low enough that you don't really need to turn it
> off. If writes are cached the fsync is almost free.
Thanks for a thoroughly answer. I guess I wont be turning of fsync. :)

Thanks Greg!

>
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com
> Baltimore, MD
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> )
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2008-06-26 01:52:59 Re: RAID 10 Benchmark with different I/O schedulers
Previous Message Scott Carey 2008-06-25 20:42:38 Query Planner not choosing hash_aggregate appropriately.