Re: Database size growing over time and leads to performance impact

From: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, Gnanakumar <gnanam(at)zoniac(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Database size growing over time and leads to performance impact
Date: 2010-04-01 21:00:24
Message-ID: 1C31A98A-7789-452F-844C-D52ECD27D788@richrelevance.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-performance


On Apr 1, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> writes:
>> Still off topic:
>
>> Will CLUSTER/VF respect FILLFACTOR in 9.0?
>
>> As far as I can tell in 8.4, it does not.
>
> Works for me, in both branches.
>

I stand corrected. I must have done something wrong in my test. On a different system I tried FILLFACTOR=45 and FILLFACTOR=90 and the resulting size was nearly a factor of two different.

> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jordz 2010-04-02 02:53:29 Postgresql-8.4 won't boot at startup on 9.10
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-01 20:42:53 Re: Database size growing over time and leads to performance impact

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2010-04-02 18:19:00 LIMIT causes planner to do Index Scan using a less optimal index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-01 20:42:53 Re: Database size growing over time and leads to performance impact