RE: [HACKERS] psql Week 1

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "'Matthew N(dot) Dodd'" <winter(at)jurai(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psql Week 1
Date: 1999-10-06 07:46:23
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F748C11E@S-NATH-EXCH2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Perhaps an option for the command:
\connect dbname /nofail
or something

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matthew N. Dodd [mailto:winter(at)jurai(dot)net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 6:59 AM
>> To: Peter Eisentraut
>> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > * when \connect fails, it now keeps the previous
>> connection (formerly
>> > aborted program)
>>
>> This is bad.
>>
>> Consider some process that connects to various DBs and does
>> stuff like
>> drop foo.
>>
>> If connect fails assume that the user no longer wanted to be
>> connected to
>> the old connection.
>>
>> --
>> | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E |
>> FreeBSD/NetBSD |
>> | winter(at)jurai(dot)net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL |
>> ix86,sparc,pmax |
>> | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent |
>> ISO8802.5 4ever |
>>
>>
>> ************
>>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 1999-10-06 08:33:00 AW: [HACKERS] psql Week 1
Previous Message Luuk de Boer 1999-10-06 06:51:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison