RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things...

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "'Leon'" <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru>, Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things...
Date: 1999-08-25 07:45:47
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F70ED12F@S-NATH-EXCH2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yes, I'll go with that.

>>
>> Adriaan Joubert wrote:
>>
>> > I think NAMEDATALEN referes to the size of a NAME field in
>> the database,
>> > which is used to store attribute names etc. So you cannot exceed
>> > NAMEDATALEN, or the identifier won't fit into the system tables.
>>
>> Ok. Let's leave identifiers alone.
>>
>> --
>> Leon.
>>
>>
>> ************
>>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ansley, Michael 1999-08-25 07:55:15 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things...
Previous Message Richard Bouska 1999-08-25 06:36:10 pg_log 100MB per day !!! on 5MB of data