RE: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0
Date: 1999-07-19 07:54:55
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F70ED056@S-NATH-EXCH2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ditto.
>>
>> > Naming it 7.0 IMHO requires transaction log, tuple split over
>> > blocks, foreign keys, outer joins and rules of arbitrary
>> > size. I don't expect ALL of them for the next release, so let
>> > it be 6.6.
>>
>> I like Jan's more complete list...
>>
>> - Thomas
>>
MikeA

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ansley, Michael 1999-07-19 08:41:05 CVS
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-19 06:53:39 Re: [HACKERS] Why DEFAULT text 'now' does not work for TIMESTAMP columns