Beta 6.5

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Beta 6.5
Date: 1999-01-07 08:13:34
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F70156A8@S-NATH-EXCH2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>> In February, we start beta on 6.5, which will have multi-version
>>> concurrency control, thanks to Vadim. For those of you who did not
like
>>> our table-level locking, you will be really surprised. Not only do
we
>>> have row-level locking, we have something even better. In row-level
>>> locking, a reader can not read a row that is locked by a writer. In
the
>>> 6.5 locking system, READERS ARE NEVER BLOCKED, and writers block
only if
>>> they try to modify a _row_ that another writer has modified and not
>>> committed.
>>>
>>> This is a major feature, better than many commercial databases.
There
>>> is also no running out of locks like commercial systems, because the
>>> transaction ids take care of that. A true NUMERIC type with
>>> user-specified precision is also planned for 6.5, thanks to Jan.

Bruce, this sounds great.

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Holger Klawitter 1999-01-07 09:24:56 [GENERAL] Subject: String Concatenation DOES work.
Previous Message -+=Mick B=+- 1999-01-07 04:11:33 Platform question..