From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'Ravindra Wankar'" <rwankar(at)iname(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability |
Date: | 2000-12-18 09:37:02 |
Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B66A@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk <http://www.maidstone.gov.uk/>
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council
-----Original Message-----
From: Ravindra Wankar [mailto:rwankar(at)iname(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:09 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 support and reliability
Can anyone share experiences using the latest Postgresql JDBC driver? What
I'm specifically looking for is
1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant?
[Peter Mount] Not fully, but getting there
2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not is there a list of unimplemented
interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys method is not implemented when
using TableGen to generate code that accesses the DB.
[Peter Mount] The interfaces are getting done one by one...
3. Is it production quality?
[Peter Mount] Some people think so ;-) From release to release it's getting
better.
Thanks,
-- Ravi.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-12-18 09:46:42 | RE: Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help.. . |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2000-12-18 08:15:50 | RE: |