RE: Re: JDBC and java.sql.Timestamp

If I can get my home linux box up and running ever again (while trying to
get the modem working last night one of the 6.5 Gig drives died on me - dead
as a dodo - so my home email is still via Windows, which doesn't work well
either), I'm going to apply the patches I have, rewrite the Makefile (to get
the version numbers automatically).

If I can get that done (with everything else here), there should be a new
compiled binary by the weekend.

PS: It should be numbered 7.0.3 if the Makefile modification works.

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk <http://www.maidstone.gov.uk/>
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg(at)tableaudebord(dot)fr]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 12:46 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] Re: JDBC and java.sql.Timestamp

I completely agree with Joseph and Bryan (I have the same problem than
Bryan).
We are 30th of August and still nothing

Do you intend to release a next RPM version 7.0.3 and a new .jar for the
Driver which fixes the bug on Timestamp?
When?
The official jdbc homepage is http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
<http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/> but it
appears to be the 7.0 driver. Peter?
Moreover, I suggest to create a link from
http://www.postgresql.org/sites.html <http://www.postgresql.org/sites.html>
to
http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ <http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/>
because it's not so clear when searching the latest driver.

Regard,

Daniel

_______________________________________
Daniel Rosenberg - drosenberg(at)audientia(dot)com
<mailto:drosenberg(at)audientia(dot)com>
________________________________________
Also, because I've been busy the last few months, I've not done anything
since 7.0 was released. I'm spending Monday catching up with the major
outstanding stuff with JDBC, and will get a compiled copy online.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk, me(at)petermount(dot)com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk <http://www.retep.org.uk/> Contact
details: http://petermount.com <http://petermount.com/>
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
<http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/>
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
<http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Shraibman" <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and java.sql.Timestamp

> I'm thinking it would justify a 7.0.3 release of postgres just to keep
> the traffic about the Timestamp off the mailing list.
>
> Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> >
> > Using the latest stable postgres and JDBC drivers, I am having a problem
> > which I have seen mentioned here previously; namely, that after
inserting a
> > row with a Timestamp column, and while attempting to retrieve it again
(via
> > JDBC), I get exceptions; I believe this is due to a bug in the format
string
> > in the jdbc client.
> >
> > Some have mentioned that a fix is available in CVS, but (believe or not)
I
> > am newbie enough to have not yet used CVS or know how to retrieve
patches
> > via it.
> >
> > Is there a released (downloadable, even RPM-downloadable) version of the
> > JDBC driver with the Timestamp issue fixed?
> >
> The official jdbc homepage is http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
<http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/> but it
> appears to be the 7.0 driver. Peter?
>
>
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Bryan